This theoretical framework reveals how persistence and collapse reflect boundary properties in various systems, suggesting new insights into stability.
Scientific and formal disciplines routinely distinguish between persistence and collapse but typically treat them as domain-specific phenomena governed by separate mechanisms. This paper presents a unified structural account showing that persistence and collapse are complementary consequences of constraint-conditioned admissibility. Two previously established laws—the Constraint-Compatibility Persistence Law (CCSL) and the Constraint-Incompatibility Collapse Law (CICL)—are shown to jointly imply a general theorem: the Paton Constraint Corridor Theorem (PCCT). The theorem states that identity persistence is equivalent to the existence of at least one admissible identity-preserving trajectory within a constraint corridor. This result reframes stability, survival, and failure as boundary properties of admissible state space rather than dynamical accidents. The framework is domain-neutral and applies uniformly across physical, biological, cognitive, and formal systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrew John Paton (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: