This commentary explores Peirce's hypothetic induction through Whewell's ideas, indicating a vital connection.
In this commentary, I draw a lineage from William Whewell’s account of ideas to what Richard Atkins insightfully singles out and develops as Peirce’s account of “hypothetic induction” in his excellent book Peirce on Inference. I argue that Whewell is a key (and yet still much-neglected) interlocutor for Peirce, and that Peirce’s grappling with Whewell’s account of ideas in induction set him on a process of pragmatic clarification, which resulted precisely in his formulation of hypothetic induction and the role of guiding principles within it.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chiara Ambrosio (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: