Peirce classifies and defends various types of inference, suggesting their roles in producing truth.
Peirce develops a nonpsychologistic theory of inference. He classifies the varieties of inference there are. He defends the validity of each kind of inference on the grounds of the roles they play in producing truth. Furthermore, he responds to arguments purporting to show that those genera of inference are not valid, such as the liar paradox and Hume’s problem of induction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richard Kenneth Atkins (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: