Demonstrates vaccine efficacy against motile Aeromonas septicemia in catfish, suggesting a new protective strategy.
Background/objectives Aeromonas hydrophila causes motile Aeromonas septicemia (MAS), which affects farm-raised catfish. Since 2009, outbreaks caused by a clonal genetic group of A. hydrophila (virulent A. hydrophila , or vAh) have caused significant losses of market-size catfish in Alabama and Mississippi. Previously, our group reported that recombinant vAh surface proteins are effective in protecting catfish against MAS. Furthermore, live attenuated Edwardsiella ictaluri vaccine strain ESC-NDKL1 is an efficacious vaccine for enteric septicemia of catfish (ESC). In the current study, we investigated ESC-NDKL1 as a potential vector for expressing vAh antigens. Methods and results Genes encoding vAh surface antigens were integrated into the ESC-NDKL1 chromosome by conjugation and homologous recombination. Six recombinant ESC-NDKL1 strains expressing one vAh antigen (ESC-NDKL1:: atpase , ESC-NDKL1:: fim , ESC-NDKL1:: fimMrfG , ESC-NDKL1:: fimA , ESC-NDKL1 ::tdr , and ESC-NDKL1:: ompA ) showed significant protection against MAS with relative percent survival (RPS) of 52.10%, 25.67%, 39.99%, 38.93%, 47.83%, and 34.07%, respectively. Eleven recombinant ESC-NDKL1 strains expressing two vAh antigens showed significant protection against MAS and improved protection compared to recombinant ESC-NDKL1 strains expressing one vAh antigen. In particular, four recombinant ESC-NDKL1 strains expressing two vAh antigens (ESC-NDKL1:: atpase :: fimMrfG , ESC-NDKL1:: fim :: fimMrfG , ESC-NDKL1:: tdr ::f imMrfG , and ESC-NDKL1:: fim :: ompA) showed significant protection ( p < 0.05) compared to non-recombinant ESC-NDKL1 with RPS of 55.72%, 60.18%, 61.74%, and 54.81%, respectively. Conclusion We identified four promising vaccine candidate strains to control MAS in the catfish industry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gomaa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: