PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026Journal of Medical Robotics Research0 citations

A Collaborative Path Planning Strategy for Robotic Soft-Tissue Surgery

View Full Paper
CCC. C. CaputoUniversity of North Carolina WilmingtonAKA. C. KrauseUniversity of North Carolina WilmingtonAMA. Meza-PantojaUniversity of North Carolina Wilmington

Key Points

  • To develop a path-planning strategy that integrates human commands with robotic execution for soft-tissue surgery.
  • Developed a collaborative path-planning method for robotic surgery
  • Utilized a haptic device for human input on key points
  • Implemented a multi-camera 3D sensing system
  • Created an autonomous filtering method to generate waypoints
  • Provided force feedback and visual cues for user support
  • Reduced waypoint spacing error by 67.6%
  • Decreased path correction probability by 33.3%
  • Shortened completion time by 40.7%
  • Lowered perceived workload by 30.5%

Abstract

In this work, we develop a collaborative path-planning method for robotic soft-tissue surgery. The proposed method aims to fill the gaps between current state-of-the-art teleoperation surgery and ideal fully autonomous surgery, which is the long-term goal of surgical robots. Via the proposed method, a human user issues high-level path planning commands that the surgical robot can autonomously execute. Specifically, a human user selects key points on a target tissue via a haptic device and a multi-camera 3D sensing and overlay system. An autonomous path-planning and filtering method then assists the user in completing the path by providing uniformly distributed waypoints on the surface of the tissue that traverse through the key points and avoid undesired regions. We also develop supplementary force feedback and visual cues to further improve the effectiveness of the proposed method by helping the user detect the 3D surface of the tissue more easily. Our results via a human subject study indicate that compared to the unassisted path generation method, the proposed method can reduce the error in spacing between the waypoints by 67.6%, the probability of making path corrections by 33.3%, the completion time by 40.7%, and the perceived workload by 30.5%.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Caputo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9d27482488d673cd2ee4https://doi.org/10.1142/s2424905x26500054
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper