PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026Leukemia2 citationsOpen Access

Artificial intelligence differentiates prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis with thrombocytosis from essential thrombocythemia using digitized bone marrow biopsy images

SWStefan WickenhauserCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de NîmesGLGiuseppe Gaetano LoscoccoMJM. Dolezal James

Key Points

  • The goal is to distinguish prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis (prePMF) from essential thrombocythemia (ET) using an AI framework.
  • Developed an AI model trained on digitized bone marrow biopsy images from MPN patients.
  • Achieved an AUROC of 0.89 and an accuracy of 92.3% in distinguishing prePMF from ET.
  • Generated synthetic images to highlight disease-specific morphologies.
  • Conducted a blinded survey with hematopathologists comparing real and AI-generated images.
  • Hematopathologists showed high agreement with AI on real images but discordance of up to 88% with AI-generated ET images.
  • Quantified higher adiposity in ET images (42.0%) compared to prePMF images (28.9%).
  • Findings suggest that AI can identify morphological features beyond established diagnostic criteria.

Abstract

Abstract Prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis (prePMF) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) are distinct myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) with overlapping clinical features, often leading to diagnostic uncertainty. We developed an artificial intelligence (AI) framework with human interpretability to distinguish prePMF from ET using digitized hematoxylin and eosin-stained bone marrow biopsy (BMB) slides. Trained on an initial cohort of MPN patients with thrombocytosis, the AI model achieved an AUROC of 0.89 and accuracy of 92.3%. To assess the image features guiding predictions, we generated synthetic images which potentially exaggerate disease-specific morphologies. In a blinded survey, hematopathologists reviewed both real and AI-generated images. While human experts frequently agreed with AI predictions on diagnosis with real images, diagnostic discordance reached up to 88% for AI-generated ET images despite being correctly predicted by AI. We further quantified marrow cellularity and adiposity in the real and generated images, which revealed a higher proportion of fat content in all ET images (42.0%) compared to prePMF (28.9%). These findings suggest that AI can utilize morphological cues distinct from current established diagnostic criteria, such as proportion of adiposity to distinguish types of MPNs. Thus, an AI-assisted diagnostic tool underscores the potential of AI to augment histopathologic evaluation and allow identification of more specific subpopulations of forms of MPNs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wickenhauser et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9d27482488d673cd2ee7https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-026-02893-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper