This numerical study analyzes mixed convection and entropy generation in a cavity with a rotating cylinder, indicating design insights for thermal management systems.
This numerical study presents a comprehensive investigation of mixed convection, thermal mechanism and entropy generation in a novel cavity system featuring a rotating, heat-conducting, half-immersed cylinder. The enclosure is filled with Cu-water nanofluid and driven by the combined effects of an inclined magnetic field and internal heat generation. The effects of key parameters-nanoparticle volume fraction ( Φ = 0% to 4%), magnetic field inclination angle ( γ = 45°, 60°, 80°), internal heat generation coefficient (Δ = 0, 3), and Grashof number (10 3 to 10 7 ) are systematically investigated. The major findings reveal that nanoparticle inclusion enhances heat transfer but increases thermodynamic irreversibility. Specifically, at Gr = 10 7 , a Φ of 4% yields a 4.3% higher Nusselt number compared to a 1.5% concentration, yet it also elevates entropy generation. The magnetic field orientation demonstrates a critical regime-dependent influence: at high Gr, a γ = 45° angle maximizes heat transfer (providing a 10% higher Nusselt number than γ = 80°), whereas a γ = 80° inclination optimizes thermodynamic efficiency by reducing entropy generation by approximately 8%. Most critically, internal heat generation is found to be profoundly detrimental, suppressing the Nusselt number by 43% at Gr = 10 3 and exacerbating entropy generation by over 11,000% in the conduction-dominated regime. The Thermal Performance Criterion analysis conclusively determines that for optimal heat transfer, a high nanoparticle concentration ( Φ = 4%) with a magnetic field at γ = 45° is recommended, while for superior thermodynamic performance, a lower concentration ( Φ = 1.5%) with a γ = 80° field is ideal. This research provides definitive guidelines for designing high-efficiency thermal management systems by leveraging hybrid nanofluid-magnetic field control, while underscoring the imperative to minimize internal heat generation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hussain et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: