Qualitative research explores micro-processes for handling constraints in BOP innovation projects, suggesting new practices emerge creatively.
This study addresses the problem of handling constraints in innovative projects. Using a qualitative research design on base of the pyramid (BOP) innovation projects, we examine how creativity emerges from constraints. By investigating responses to experienced constraints from 60 BOP innovation projects, we identify specific micro‐processes used to deal with constraints, which we introduce as constraint‐handling practices. Moreover, we investigate the interplay between these constraint‐handling practices and the nature of the constraints in the resultant sequence of such micro‐processes, distinguishing between goal and task constraints. Drawing from theory on effectuation and causation, we explain how different constraint‐handling practices are implemented in innovation projects in response to these constraints. We demonstrate that instead of relying on an either/or mode of effectuation versus causation, actors in constrained BOP innovation projects exhibit repeated cycles of both effectuation‐ and causation‐based constraint‐handling practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doms et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: