PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology0 citations

A Hybrid Machine Learning Model Optimized by Chaotic Dung Beetle Algorithm for Explainable Osteoporosis Risk Prediction

View Full Paper
HMHaoyu MengJHJianjun Huang

Key Points

  • The study aims to develop an explainable machine learning model optimized for predicting osteoporosis risk.
  • Developed a hybrid machine learning framework using clinical and biochemical variables.
  • Utilized Chaotic Dung Beetle Optimization for hyperparameter optimization.
  • Employed the Boruta algorithm to identify key predictors from clinical samples.
  • Tested multiple ensemble learning algorithms, including LightGBM, GBDT, and XGBoost.
  • LightGBM achieved a training AUC of approximately 0.998.
  • Test AUC exceeded 0.85 after optimization.
  • Femoral neck BMD, total lumbar T-score, and calcitriol were identified as key predictors.

Abstract

This study develops an explainable hybrid machine learning framework, which is optimized by an improved Chaotic Dung Beetle Optimization (CSDBO) algorithm, to enhance the accuracy of osteoporosis (OP) risk prediction. Based on 1,537 clinical samples and 39 clinical and biochemical variables obtained from the Harvard Dataverse, the Boruta algorithm was employed to identify 12 key predictors. CSDBO was then used to perform intelligent hyperparameter optimization and model selection for multiple ensemble learning algorithms, including LightGBM, GBDT, and XGBoost. After optimization, LightGBM achieved the best performance, with a training AUC of approximately 0.998 and a test AUC exceeding 0.85. SHAP-based interpretability analysis indicated that femoral neck BMD, total lumbar T-score, and calcitriol were among the most influential factors. The proposed framework improves predictive accuracy and model stability while maintaining high interpretability, demonstrating potential value for clinical risk assessment and individualized intervention. Detailed algorithmic formulations and implementation procedures are provided in the Methods section.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Meng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9d8e482488d673cd3779https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219519426400178
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Decision Curve Analysis: A Novel Method for Evaluating Prediction Models2006 · 6,059 citations
  2. 2Multiple imputation by chained equations: what is it and how does it work?2011 · 3,616 citations
  3. 3Grey Wolf Optimizer2014 · 19,191 citations
  4. 4Correction: Developing an integrated clinical decision support system for the early identification and management of kidney disease—building cross-sectoral partnerships2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Random Forests2001 · 131,640 citations