Observational analysis found potential benefits of traditional Korean medicine in pediatric epilepsy, suggesting further investigation is needed.
Given the limitations of conventional antiepileptic drugs and the growing need for complementary approaches, traditional Korean medicine has gained interest as a potential treatment option for pediatric and adolescent epilepsy. However, real-world clinical data on its use and safety remain limited. This exploratory study aimed to retrospectively investigate the real-world clinical use and safety of traditional Korean medicine in this population by analyzing medical records from 2 Korean medicine hospitals. A total of 54 patients were included. Demographic characteristics, growth-related indicators, seizure-related indicators, treatment patterns, follow-up duration, antiepileptic drug use, and adverse events were reviewed retrospectively. The mean age at seizure onset was 4.9 ± 4.9 years. Over a mean follow-up duration of 21.6 months, patients had an average of 10.2 ± 13.6 clinical visits and received heterogeneous treatment patterns, including herbal medicine decoction, herbal medicine formulation, and acupuncture. Mean height increased from 122.4 ± 27.6 to 134.0 ± 24.5 cm, and mean weight increased from 29.6 ± 22.1 to 34.9 ± 20.5 kg. Mean seizure frequency decreased from 0.7 ± 1.2 times per day at baseline to 0.2 ± 0.5 times per day during the follow-up period ( P = .002). Antiepileptic drug regimens remained largely unchanged during the study period among patients with available medication data. Mild adverse events were reported in 5 patients (nausea, abdominal pain, and diarrhea), all of which resolved without serious complications. This study provides real-world insights into the clinical use and tolerability of traditional Korean medicine treatment in pediatric and adolescent epilepsy. Although therapeutic efficacy cannot be established due to the absence of a control group, these findings offer foundational data to support future hypothesis-driven studies assessing the safety and potential effectiveness of traditional Korean medicine in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: