Matched cohort study investigates diabetes risk post-COVID-19 infection in vaccinated individuals, suggesting implications for monitoring health outcomes.
Background Earlier studies have suggested that SARS-CoV-2 infection increases the risk of subsequently developing diabetes. However, reports are more limited and inconsistent for infection with the Omicron variant and how COVID-19 vaccination may alter the risks. Methods A population-based, matched cohort study was conducted by using linked registry data. Individuals aged ≥16 years diagnosed with COVID-19 between 15 December 2021 and 31 December 2022 were matched to those without COVID-19 by age, sex, and COVID-19 vaccine recency. Cause-specific Cox models were used to estimate the association between COVID-19 and the initiation of diabetes treatment, adjusting for relevant demographic, healthcare-utilization, and health-related factors. Negative control outcomes were assessed. Results Among 5 736 501 matched pairs with and without COVID-19, followed for a median of 200 days, 45 816 initiated diabetes treatment. Compared with those without COVID-19, individuals with COVID-19 had a 14% higher risk of subsequently initiating diabetes treatment [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.14; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12; 1.17]. The risk was higher for those who had received up to two COVID-19 vaccine doses compared with those who had received a booster within the last 90 days (aHR 1.22; 95% CI 1.18, 1.25 vs aHR 1.08; 95% CI 1.04, 1.12). Similar associations were observed between COVID-19 and negative control outcomes while the incidence patterns differed. Conclusion While we observed a small increased risk of diabetes following SARS-CoV-2 infection during the Omicron-dominant period, the true causal effect could be small or even null given the potential unmeasured confounding and detection bias. Future research on post-acute COVID-19 outcomes should consider including negative control outcomes to better detect potential biases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qian et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: