Key result
RAAS inhibition shows no benefit over control for delaying kidney failure in advanced CKD.
Why the study?
Maintaining renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibition in advanced CKD to delay progression remains controversial due to potential side effects such as GFR decline and hyperkalemia.
Does renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibition affect the progression to kidney failure in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease?
Does renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibition affect the progression to kidney failure in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease?
Maintaining RAASi in advanced CKD does not accelerate progression to kidney failure, supporting its continued use for extrarenal indications such as cardiovascular protection.
RAAS inhibition was not associated with kidney failure progression in advanced CKD; leaves open continuation for cardiovascular protection pending RCTs.
Introduction: Maintaining renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibition (RAASi) in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) to delay CKD progression is still controversial. This is due to potential side effects associated with RAASi, such as a decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and hyperkalemia. This study aimed to examine the effect of RAASi on progression of advanced CKD to kidney failure (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <15 mL/min/1.73 m2, CKD stage 5) in a real-life outpatient cohort. Methods: This single-center retrospective observational study presents data from 954 individuals with advanced CKD (eGFR 15–30 mL/min/1.73 m2), comparing 806 RAASi with 511 control intervals over a median follow-up period of 19 months. The endpoint was defined as time to manifestation of kidney failure. Univariate and multivariate time-to-event analyses were performed to assess effects of RAASi on endpoint probabilities. Results: Univariate time-to-event analysis did not show a significant difference in the median time to kidney failure between RAASi and control intervals (7.6 vs. 7.0 years, p = 0.74). Covariate-adjusted multivariate regression models also demonstrated no association between RAASi treatment and progression to kidney failure in patients with advanced CKD (hazard ratio 0.92 [95% CI: 0.67–1.23], p = 0.63). Conclusion: RAASi has no significant impact on the time to kidney failure in patients with advanced CKD. Hence, this study supports maintenance of RAASi in advanced CKD, if used for extrarenal indications such as cardiovascular protection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Westermann et al. (2025) studied this question. RAAS inhibition showed no significant effect on time to kidney failure in advanced CKD patients (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.67–1.23, p=0.63) over median 19 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: