Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Case report shows EUS-guided drainage effectively treats intra-abdominal abscess in a man after gastric EMR, suggesting it as a viable option when conservative therapy fails.
Delayed perforation after gastric endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a rare but serious complication that can lead to intra‐abdominal abscess (IAA) formation. Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)‐guided drainage for IAA remains to be elucidated. A man in his 50s was admitted for EMR of hyperplastic polyps located in the gastric body. The procedure was performed uneventfully; however, on postoperative day (POD) 4, the patient developed a sudden fever accompanied by an elevation in inflammatory markers. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed a localized area of increased fat attenuation, leading to a diagnosis of delayed perforation. The patient's condition temporarily improved with conservative therapy; however, fever and elevated inflammatory markers recurred on POD 17. CT demonstrated IAA requiring drainage. On POD 22, EUS‐guided transgastric drainage was performed using a nasobiliary drainage tube and double‐pigtail stent. After drainage, fever and inflammatory markers promptly alleviated; follow‐up CT demonstrated shrinkage of the abscess cavity. The clinical course was uneventful. EUS‐guided transgastric drainage could be a safe and effective therapeutic option for IAA secondary to delayed perforation after gastric EMR, particularly when conservative therapy fails and percutaneous drainage is not feasible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tanino et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: