Gain- and loss-of-function mutants reveal ETR1's role in lateral root formation and ethylene biosynthesis in Arabidopsis.
In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), a family of five receptors mediates ethylene responses in roots, with Ethylene Response 1 (ETR1) controlling increases in root hair proliferation and decreases in lateral root formation. To define the ETR1-dependent gene regulatory network (GRN) controlling root development, we profiled the root transcriptome from Col-0 and the etr1-3 gain-of-function and etr1-7 loss-of-function mutants in the presence and absence of ethylene or the ethylene precursor 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC). We identified 4,522 differentially expressed (DE) transcripts in Col-0 roots that displayed altered abundance in response to ethylene and/or ACC treatment, with larger-magnitude changes induced by ethylene. These included 553 DE transcripts that were ETR1 dependent, defined by a lack of response to treatment with ethylene and/or ACC in ethylene-insensitive etr1-3 and constitutive alteration response in etr1-7 in the presence or absence of treatment relative to time-0 Col-0. Among these ETR1-dependent transcripts were transcripts from genes associated with ethylene biosynthesis and those encoding transcription factors. Reporter fusions driven by promoters from ACC OXIDASE 2 (ACO2) and ACO3, which convert ACC to ethylene, were regulated by ACC in root tissues in appropriate locations to control root development, with pACO5-driven GFP detected in root hairs. We examined the abundance of ETR1-dependent transcripts predicted to encode transcription factors and ACOs in Col-0 and an ein3 eil1 mutant, with and without ACC treatment. Our results suggested that the ETR1 and Ethylene Insensitive 3 (EIN3)/EIN3-like 1 (EIL1) canonical ethylene signaling pathway regulates some, but not all, of these transcriptional responses. Together, these findings reveal features of an ETR1-dependent GRN that controls both ethylene biosynthesis and root growth and development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
White et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: