Use of Impella for LV unloading reduced 30-day composite of all-cause mortality or exVAD implantation to 8% versus 53% with IABP in fulminant myocarditis patients on VA-ECMO.
Cohort (n=27)
No
Does a microaxial flow pump (Impella) improve the composite of 30-day mortality or exVAD implantation compared to an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in patients with fulminant myocarditis supported by VA-ECMO?
In patients with fulminant myocarditis requiring VA-ECMO, left ventricular unloading with a microaxial flow pump (Impella) was associated with improved short-term survival free from exVAD implantation compared to IABP, though with a higher risk of hemolysis.
Effect estimate: HR not reported but Log-rank P=0.018 favoring Impella group
Absolute Event Rate: 8% vs 53%
p-value: p=0.009
Background: The clinical differences between intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP) and a microaxial flow pump (Impella) for left ventricular (LV) unloading in patients with fulminant myocarditis (FM) supported with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) remain unclear.
Iikura et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in fulminant myocarditis (n=27). Impella microaxial flow pump vs. intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) was evaluated on composite of all-cause mortality or extracorporeal ventricular assist device (exVAD) implantation within 30 days of VA-ECMO initiation (HR not reported but Log-rank P=0.018 favoring Impella group, p=0.009). Use of Impella for LV unloading reduced 30-day composite of all-cause mortality or exVAD implantation to 8% versus 53% with IABP in fulminant myocarditis patients on VA-ECMO.