Multicyclic performance of biowaste adsorbents captures CO2 effectively, suggesting viable alternatives for carbon capture.
• Pyrolysis is the preferred method to produce CO 2 adsorbents using biowastes. • The kinetic models accurately reproduced the experimental CO 2 capture performance. • Cork- and rice husk-based adsorbents do not deactivate over five cycles. • The CO 2 uptake from cement plant flue gas was higher than expected. The multicyclic kinetic performance and equilibrium CO 2 adsorption capacities of different biowaste-based adsorbents were measured experimentally, modelled and compared using pure CO 2 streaming and cement plant flue gas. Biowaste-based adsorbents used for CO 2 capture were synthesized from cork stoppers, grape marc, and rice husks via pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization with and without lanthanum functionalization. The results demonstrate that pyrolysis is a more effective method than hydrothermal carbonization for producing CO 2 -capturing adsorbents from tested biowastes. These adsorbents can reach equilibrium CO 2 carrying capacities of up to 63 mg/g at atmospheric temperature and pressure. No deactivation was observed over five adsorption/desorption cycles for cork- and rice husk-based adsorbents and the deactivation observed for grape marc-based adsorbents under flue gas can be overcome via lanthanum functionalization. Kinetic parameters for CO 2 adsorption on biowaste-based adsorbents were calculated and compared to identify the impact of micropores and mesopores on separation performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amorim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: