Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This framework demonstrates assessing toxicity in aquatic organisms, highlighting the impact of temperature and contaminants.
Aquatic organisms face simultaneous stress from rising temperatures and chemical contaminants, yet ecotoxicological assays rarely account for temperature-driven physiological aging. We introduce a framework combining degree-days (D°) and chemical activity to disentangle physiological and chemical drivers of toxicity. This approach was tested using Daphnia magna exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Two exposure designs were compared: (1) fixed duration (72 h) at 20 and 25 °C, and (2) D°-standardized exposure corresponding to 60 D° (72 h at 20 °C; 58 h at 25 °C). Chemical activity, a thermodynamic measure of bioavailable dose, was used as the exposure metric, with the median lethal activity (La50) as the primary endpoint. To provide a more nuanced view of the metabolism, sublethal responses (δ¹³C, C/N ratio, protein content) were also evaluated. In fixed-time exposures, La50 values were lower at 25 °C, indicating greater apparent toxicity at elevated temperature. This difference disappeared under D° normalization, showing that increased mortality reflected faster physiological aging rather than altered PAH behavior. Metabolic indicators supported this interpretation, revealing PAH-driven, temperature-independent energy depletion. By aligning exposure with cumulative thermal experience and quantifying dose as chemical activity, this framework enables temperature-normalized toxicity assessment and supports climate-aware ecological risk evaluation for HOCs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gorokhova et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: