PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 24, 2026Palliative Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Barriers and enablers to community living: A mixed-methods systems study of young adults with life-limiting conditions

View Full Paper
ALAli LakhaniGriffith UniversityDSDeniz SenyelLa Trobe UniversityRMRuth Mackenzie-StewartLa Trobe University

Key Points

  • This study aims to identify factors that affect younger adults with life-limiting conditions in remaining in the community and how those factors interact.
  • Mixed-methods design combining retrospective case-note analysis and semi-structured interviews
  • Data collected from 63 younger adults connected to a national care-coordination program
  • Thematic coding used to develop a causal loop diagram illustrating system dynamics and leverage points
  • Five interdependent domains influencing community living were identified: informal care, formal care, service navigation, respite access, and condition severity
  • Causal loop diagram revealed three reinforcing and two balancing loops
  • Key leverage points included enhancing respite access, improving carer wellbeing, and streamlining navigation and eligibility processes

Abstract

Background: Adults aged 18–64 years with life-limiting conditions often fall through gaps in health and disability systems, particularly due to service ineligibility. Although home-based palliative care improves outcomes and cost-effectiveness, structural inequities and fragmented services can prevent younger adults from remaining in the community. Aim: To identify factors influencing the ability of younger adults with life-limiting conditions to remain in the community and to map how these factors interact – using Australia as an illustrative context – through a systems-thinking approach. Design: Mixed-methods study combining retrospective case-note analysis and semi-structured interviews. Thematic coding informed a causal loop diagram visualizing system dynamics and leverage points. Setting/participants: Sixty-three younger adults connected to a national care-coordination program supporting those at risk of residential aged-care entry due to ineligibility for disability or aged-care funding. Data comprised 48 case notes and 15 interviews across all Australian jurisdictions. Results: Five interdependent domains influenced community living: informal care, formal care, service navigation, respite access, and condition severity. The causal loop diagram revealed three reinforcing and two balancing loops. Key leverage points included respite access, carer wellbeing, and streamlined navigation and eligibility processes. Conclusions: Systems thinking clarified how interactions among informal care, formal supports, and symptom severity shape care continuity. Findings highlight the need to position respite, practical carer support and navigation assistance as core components of community-based palliative care, and to align disability, aged-care and palliative-care systems so younger adults are not excluded from essential support due to age or funding rules.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lakhani et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699d3fc8de8e28729cf64906https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163261418445
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper