Demonstrates an AI-based framework for selecting construction managers, improving recruitment efficiency in developing nations.
This study aims to develop a data-driven framework for identifying a Competent Construction Manager by integrating artificial intelligence–based recruitment techniques with a rigorously validated competency assessment model in the context of developing countries. The research follows a three-phase methodology. In the first phase, 35 construction management competency skills are identified through a systematic literature review and validated by a panel of 10 domain experts using content validity, reliability, and construct validation techniques. In the second phase, a dataset of 250 candidate resumes collected from LinkedIn, Google Forms, and email submissions is analyzed using AI-based psychometric assessment (Pymetrics) and natural language processing techniques, including text mining and embedding models, to extract behavioral, semantic, and structured candidate attributes. In the third phase, a case study from India is conducted, where candidates are shortlisted based on owner-defined requirements, and validated competencies are mapped to shortlisted candidates (N = 53) using a structured questionnaire and statistical analysis in SPSS. The results demonstrate that the proposed framework effectively ranks and identifies the top five candidates for interview by integrating competency-based evaluation with AI-derived insights, significantly improving objectivity, decision quality, and recruitment efficiency while reducing screening time. The study also highlights limitations related to self-reported competency assessments and contextual biases in owner-defined requirements, suggesting the need for future validation across diverse projects and regions. Overall, the proposed framework provides a systematic, AI-enabled approach to construction manager selection aligned with industry competency standards and emerging intelligent recruitment practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bharadwaj et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: