Analysis investigates conductor rigidity in the ternary Goldbach problem, suggesting limitations of the theory.
We investigate whether the conductor rigidity framework for the binary Goldbach conjecture (genus 2, GSp(4)) extends to the ternary problem p₁+p₂+p₃=N (genus 3, GSp(6)). By computing the true discriminant of the genus-3 hyperelliptic Frey curve, we show that the algebraic identity p²−q²=(p−q)N which underpins binary conductor rigidity has no ternary analogue: N does not appear as an independent factor in the genus-3 discriminant, entering only through partial sums (N−pₖ). Consequently, the Band Shifting Law ceases to hold (R²=0.0002 against the static conduit variable ξ). The ternary conductor decomposes into summand, difference, and partial-sum contributions whose interplay is governed by prime-factor statistics rather than algebraic structure. The PPP–CCC gap shrinks from a large stable separation (binary) to a marginal offset of 0.10±0.07 (ternary). These results precisely delineate the applicability boundary of conductor rigidity: the theory is native to genus 2, where the factorisation p²−q²=(p−q)N embeds N as a universal geometric invariant of the Frey family.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruqing Chen (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: