Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis compares legislation on arbitrator removal for bias across multiple jurisdictions, indicating a search for common standards.
Singapore, Australia, and England have each differently legislated for the removal of arbitrators for bias. This paper examines the outcomes of several cases from each jurisdiction to determine whether the law for removal of arbitrators for bias is essentially the same. The paper also considers the influence international ethical guidelines have had in producing a commonality of outcome in this regard.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matthew Harvey (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: