Case report evaluates DNASE1L3 deficiency, showcasing pathogenic variants and response to treatment in a patient with systemic inflammation.
Objective Biallelic loss‐of‐function variants in DNASE1L3 cause inherited systemic lupus erythematosus and hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis. These disorders arise from defective clearance of extracellular chromatin, leading to autoantibody formation, immune complex deposition, and complement consumption. The full clinical and therapeutic spectrum of DNASE1L3 deficiency remains incompletely defined. Methods We evaluated a 24‐year‐old woman with lifelong systemic inflammation characterized by polyarthritis, urticarial vasculitis, episcleritis, recurrent abdominal pain with intestinal angioedema, and persistent hypocomplementemia. Testing included autoantibody profiling, whole‐exome sequencing, DNASE1L3 enzymatic assays in cell lysates and supernatants, and plasma analysis of cell‐free DNA fragmentation. Results The patient lacked antinuclear, anti–double‐stranded DNA, and anti‐Smith antibodies, though antiphospholipid antibodies were intermittently positive. The disease was refractory to multiple immunosuppressive agents but showed partial improvement with JAK inhibition. Genetic analysis revealed compound heterozygous DNASE1L3 variants: a pathogenic frameshift (c.290_291delCA) and a novel missense change (c.179T>G, p.Ile60Ser). Functional testing showed markedly impaired DNA degradation for both variants, with residual activity in the missense mutant. Plasma DNA analysis demonstrated reduced mononucleosomal peaks, altered fragment length distribution, and loss of cytosine–cytosine–rich end motifs, confirming reduced nuclease activity in vivo. Conclusion This case supports the pathogenicity of the DNASE1L3 p.Ile60Ser variant broadening the genetic spectrum. Plasma DNA fragment analysis provides a sensitive biomarker of impaired nuclease function, and JAK inhibition may offer partial therapeutic benefit in DNASE1L3‐related systemic inflammation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tenorio et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: