Analysis reveals how Tanzania strategically employs humanitarian diplomacy to navigate constraints and enhance influence.
This study investigates how Tanzania, a non-donor state in the Global South, strategically deploys humanitarian diplomacy (HD) to advance foreign policy objectives while navigating structural constraints and normative commitments. Drawing on 31 semi-structured interviews, policy document analysis, and thematic coding across Dodoma, Kigoma, and Dar es Salaam (July 2023–July 2024), the research reveals that Tanzania blends Pan-African solidarity, liberation heritage, and security cooperation into a hybrid HD model. The findings, categorized as Value-Embedded Humanitarian Engagement, Governance Architecture for Humanitarian Influence, and Resilience Dilemmas in a Constrained Idealism Context, demonstrate that Tanzania’s HD functions as both a moral commitment and a tool for accruing soft power. Yet fiscal dependency, centralized decision-making, and host-community legitimacy pressures constrain agility and long-term sustainability. By integrating constructivism, soft power theory, political economy, and constrained idealism, the paper offers a novel analytical framework for understanding non-donor HD in the Global South and proposes policy reforms for enhancing its effectiveness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kajerero et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: