PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 25, 2026Agronomy for Sustainable Development2 citationsOpen Access

Clarifying factors involved in historical soybean yield suppression in Japan using national statistics and a crop model

SKS. KobayashiYKYoji KunimitsuSNSatoshi Nakano

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze factors that have suppressed soybean yields in Japan using statistical data and a crop model.
  • Analyzed national production-cost statistics from 1987 to 2018.
  • Used panel data from different land-size sections and regions.
  • Conducted panel regression to assess relationships between yield and production inputs.
  • Actual soybean yield declined by 18% despite an 8% increase in potential yield over 32 years.
  • 14-21% yield reduction linked to decreased water management and weed control failures.
  • Higher agricultural social capital score correlated with a 19% yield reduction.

Abstract

Abstract Soybean yields have remained below 2.0 t ha −1 for over 30 years in Asian countries; however, few studies have analyzed national statistical data in detail to explore the underlying factors. This is the first study to analyze precisely and comprehensively factors involved in the historical soybean yield suppression in Japan by using national production-cost and other statistics, coupled with a crop model. Panel data of 5–6 land-size sections for 1987–2018 were prepared to analyze the regression of actual yield against 13 production input-related variables, model-predicted potential yield, and agricultural social capital score by each data class for the whole country (i.e., Japan), two climatic regions (temperate and subarctic), and two field types (converted paddy and upland). Although potential yield rose by 8% for the studied 32 years at the country/national level, actual yield declined by 18%, and this was primarily attributed to trends in converted paddy fields in the temperate region. Panel regression analyses showed that for this field type and region, a total of 14–21% actual yield reduction occurred with decreased water management input, as well as increases in weed control failure and converted paddy fields, resulting in a 16% reduction at the country level. In contrast, the increased potential yield, mainly due to climatic changes (warming), contributed to improving actual yields by 7–8% in the region and country, thereby partially offsetting the above yield reduction. Against our expectation, no actual yield improvement was observed with increased agricultural social capital score, but rather a 19% reduction for the country. Implications of the results for policymakers and scientists aiming to improve country-level soybean yields in Japan were discussed, as well as the importance of potential yield as an explanatory variable and that of spatial error model for panel data of land-size sections.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kobayashi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699e9106f5123be5ed04e4f1https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-025-01078-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Long term production data for six major crops at the prefectural level in Japan from 1883 to 20222025
  2. 2Current status and obstacles of narrowing yield gaps of four major crops2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Soil health improvement and climate change mitigation in soybean agroecosystems2026
  4. 4A Bayesian approach to assessing uncertainty in the effect of fertilization strategies on paddy rice yield via multiple on-farm experiments2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Climate change and economic policy dominate soybean cultivation in china in recent decades of the 21st century2026