Demonstrates a new framework for predicting critical heat flux, enhancing accuracy for various flow conditions.
Critical Heat Flux (CHF) is a fundamental safety parameter in high-heat-flux equipment, but its prediction is complicated by multiple underlying mechanisms (e.g., departure from nucleate boiling (DNB) in bubbly flow, dryout in annular flow, etc.). Conventional approaches like empirical correlations, look-up tables, and mechanistic models are often constrained by their applicability to certain flow regimes or CHF mechanisms. Recently, machine learning (ML) methods have received attention for the ability to capture complex nonlinear relationships from data. While physics-aided machine learning (PAML) integrates a physical model within ML to overcome the limitation of purely data-driven tactics, conventional PAML relies on a single physical model, biasing predictions towards its specific CHF mechanism. A novel framework adapting multiple physical models within ML framework for diverse flow boiling conditions, termed as multi-physics aided machine learning (MPAML) is proposed for accurate CHF prediction. A large database (26,894 points) has been accumulated for training and validation of the framework. Two physical models, Katto (1984) correlation and Liu (2000) models chosen as representative of dryout and DNB CHF mechanisms are integrated within neural network (NN) to develop the framework. This framework shows good accuracy while prediction in multi-CHF mechanism regions. Physical behavior analysis of CHF in terms of mass flux, pressure, inlet subcooling, diameter and length-to-diameter ratio shows better physics information inheritance capability of this framework over other frameworks in multi-CHF mechanisms. The findings display that MPAML mitigates bias in CHF estimation and outperforms traditional PAML methods, offering higher prediction accuracy and broader applicability across various CHF mechanisms. • A new framework combining multiple physical models and ML for better CHF prediction technique. • Accounts for limitation of conventional Physics-aided Machine Learning (PAML). • Exhibits superior integration of physical knowledge than pure machine learning (ML) and conventional PAML frameworks. • Reliable prediction capacity in both DNB and dryout CHF mechanisms. • Reflects the framework's strength in seamlessly integrating multiple physical insights within ML's data-driven power.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahmud et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: