Investigates the efficacy of air huff-and-puff for oil recovery in tight reservoirs, suggesting optimized recovery strategies.
This study investigates the dynamic evolution and efficacy of oxygen-reducing air huff-and-puff (HnP) for enhanced oil recovery in tight reservoirs, employing a novel large-scale two-dimensional plate model (30 × 30 × 3.5 cm) and a single-dimensional elongated core to simulate oxygen-depletion processes across 13 HnP cycles. Through systematic experimental trials, we examined key operational factors─well shut-in duration and production pressure differentials─to quantify recovery efficiency. Results reveal that oil displacement is primarily driven by pressure-difference-induced fluid dynamics (63.04% of total recovery), with diffusion-mass transfer as a secondary mechanism (36.96%), highlighting minimal light hydrocarbon extraction and limited crude oil fractionation capacity. Crucially, HnP performance is governed by shut-in duration and pressure differentials, with a single cycle categorized into three distinct stages: single-phase gas flowback, free gas drive, and declining productivity. The free gas drive stage dominates oil production, evidenced by the gas-to-oil ratio, oil rate, and bottom-hole pressure variations, underscoring its critical role in optimizing recovery strategies for tight reservoirs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: