Demonstrates synergy in biocontrol efficacy against nematodes in a co-cultivation system, suggesting practical applications for agricultural management.
The ascomycete fungus Clonostachys rosea is a promising biocontrol agent against root-knot nematodes. To develop a more effective and stable biocontrol strategy, we rationally constructed a co-culture system by partnering C. rosea with the plant growth-promoting bacterium Bacillus velezensis. Through systematic optimization of the medium and inoculation protocol, the co-culture demonstrated significantly enhanced performance, achieving 95.3% mortality of Meloidogyne incognita juveniles, a 78.0% increase in tomato shoot dry weight, and 69.2% disease control efficacy in pot trials. Metabolomic profiling indicated that the co-culture triggered a distinct metabolic profile compared to the respective monocultures. The enhanced efficacy was associated with the accumulation of two functional metabolite groups. First, the co-culture synergistically accumulated direct-effect compounds with reported nematicidal (e.g., daidzin, L-tryptophan) and plant-growth-promoting (e.g., isopentenyladenine, melatonin, and indole-3-propionic acid) activities. In parallel, L-proline emerged as a critical microbial interaction modulator. Targeted quantification showed a clear proline abundance gradient: highest in the C. rosea monoculture, intermediate in co-culture, and lowest in the B. velezensis monoculture. This gradient suggests that proline produced by C. rosea is likely utilized by B. velezensis, a finding further supported by the observation that proline enhanced bacterial biofilm formation and upregulated the matrix genes epsC and tasA. Accordingly, the co-culture itself formed significantly more robust biofilms. Thus, the enhanced biocontrol can be attributed to synergistic metabolite accumulation together with proline-mediated fitness gains in the bacterial partner, establishing a metabolic basis for rationally engineering microbial consortia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: