PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 25, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Are There Causal Associations Between Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Cardiometabolic Phenotypes? A Genetic Correlation and Bi-Directional Mendelian Randomization Study

View Full Paper
RWRobyn E. WoottonJCJames J CrowleyJPJosep Pol-Fuster

Key Points

  • This study aims to clarify the association between obsessive-compulsive disorder and cardiometabolic phenotypes using genetic approaches.
  • Conducted genetic correlation analyses for 14 cardiometabolic phenotypes and OCD.
  • Used bi-directional summary-level Mendelian randomization to identify causal effects.
  • Assessed the relationship between OCD and phenotypes such as blood pressure and BMI.
  • No significant genetic correlations found, except a negative correlation with BMI.
  • Bi-directional Mendelian randomization showed no causal effects.
  • Limited evidence of shared genetic etiology was detected in the largest OCD GWAS available.

Abstract

In epidemiological studies, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is robustly associated with increased risk of cardiometabolic disorders, including cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes, and obesity. However, the mechanisms behind these associations are unclear. We conducted genetic correlation analyses to explore shared genetic etiology and bi-directional summary-level Mendelian randomization (MR) to explore potential causal effects between genetic liability to OCD and 14 cardiometabolic phenotypes (e.g., coronary artery disease, blood pressure, body mass index BMI). If causal effects were observed, we planned to conduct multivariable MR to explore indirect effects via health behaviors. We found no evidence for genetic correlations between OCD and any of the cardiometabolic phenotypes under study, except for a negative correlation with BMI (rG = -0.123, SE = 0.029, p < 0.001). Summary-level MR showed no evidence for causal effects. Therefore, multivariable MR was not conducted. We found limited evidence for shared genetic etiology or causal effects using the largest OCD GWAS to date. However, we were predominantly only powered to detect medium to large effects in the direction of OCD to cardiometabolic traits, leaving the possibility of smaller causal effects existing. Future studies with larger, more representative samples will help to further interpret findings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wootton et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699e919cf5123be5ed04f53chttps://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-292334
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper