Prospective evaluation of PAP-1 concentrations in dogs with gastrointestinal issues, suggesting limited diagnostic value.
Background Pancreatitis-associated protein (PAP-1) is synthesized during acute pancreatitis (AP) and chronic enteropathy in people. Serum PAP-1 concentration (PAP-1) has not been measured prospectively in dogs. Objectives Evaluate whether PAP-1 differentiates suspected AP (sAP) diagnosed by abnormal DGGR-lipase activity from non-pancreatic acute gastrointestinal disease (aGId) diagnosed by normal DGGR-lipase activity. Animals Twenty-six dogs with sAP, 48 dogs with aGId based on signs of acute gastrointestinal disease, lipase activity > 450 U/L (reference interval [RI],17-156 U/L) and maximally 20 U/L > RI, respectively. Forty healthy control dogs. Methods Prospective daily assessment included a simplified modified canine activity index (MCAI). PAP-1, lipase activity, C-reactive protein concentration (CRP) were measured daily. PAP-1 assay validation comprised precision, interferences, linearity, and RI establishment. Results Lower/upper PAP-1 quantification limits were 0.2 and 6.0 μg/mL, linearity was excellent (R2 0.999) at high, acceptable (R2 0.966) at low PAP-1 concentrations. Intra-, inter-run precision was ≤5%, ≤22%, PAP-1 remained stable for 15 days (room temperature), no interferences were found. Duration of hospitalization and clinical disease severity did not differ between groups. At admission, PAP-1 above RI in 50% and 48 % of sAP and aGId dogs, respectively (sAP median, range 1.88 μg/mL, 0.2-6.0 vs. aGId 1.57 μg/mL, 0.2-6.0; RI, <1.9 μg/mL). PAP-1 did not differ significantly between groups irrespective of observation time points. PAP-1 correlated significantly with CRP in sAP (rs = 0.623) and aGId (rs = 0.483). PAP-1 correlated significantly with lipase activity (rs = 0.474) in sAP, with MCAI (rs = 0.342) in aGId. Conclusion and clinical importance Serum PAP-1 reflects inflammation rather than underlying disease processes, and does not differentiate sAP from aGId.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sidler et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: