Does spironolactone reduce the composite outcome of cardiovascular death, aborted cardiac arrest, or heart failure hospitalization in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction?
Patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction
Spironolactone
Composite outcome of death from cardiovascular causes, aborted cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for the management of heart failurecomposite
Spironolactone does not significantly improve the primary composite cardiovascular outcome in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
Background: Mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonists improve the prognosis for patients with heart failure and a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. We evaluated the effects of spironolactone in patients with heart failure and a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind trial, we assigned 3445 patients with symptomatic heart failure and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 45% or more to receive either spironolactone (15 to 45 mg daily) or placebo. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, aborted cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for the management of heart failure. Results: With a mean follow-up of 3.3 years, the primary outcome occurred in 320 of 1722 patients in the spironolactone group (18.6%) and 351 of 1723 patients in the placebo group (20.4%) (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.77 to 1.04; P=0.14). Of the components of the primary outcome, only hospitalization for heart failure had a significantly lower incidence in the spironolactone group than in the placebo group (206 patients 12.0% vs. 245 patients 14.2%; hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.99, P=0.04). Neither total deaths nor hospitalizations for any reason were significantly reduced by spironolactone. Treatment with spironolactone was associated with increased serum creatinine levels and a doubling of the rate of hyperkalemia (18.7%, vs. 9.1% in the placebo group) but reduced hypokalemia. With frequent monitoring, there were no significant differences in the incidence of serious adverse events, a serum creatinine level of 3.0 mg per deciliter (265 μmol per liter) or higher, or dialysis. Conclusions: In patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction, treatment with spironolactone did not significantly reduce the incidence of the primary composite outcome of death from cardiovascular causes, aborted cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for the management of heart failure. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; TOPCAT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00094302 .)
“There might be a beneficial effect of spironolactone in these patients if they are able to be on drug treatment.”
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bertram Pitt
Marc A. Pfeffer
Susan F. Assmann
New England Journal of Medicine
University of Michigan
Brigham and Women's Hospital
University of Wisconsin–Madison
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Pitt et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/699f5f9f5791b73a5293d752 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1313731
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: