Combination treatments reveal improved efficacy against menin inhibitor resistance in AML cells, indicating new therapeutic options.
Menin inhibitors (MI) disrupt the binding of Menin to MLL1 leading to repression of MLL1 or MLL1-fusion protein (FP) target genes, including reduced levels of HOXA9 and MEIS1 in AML with mutant (mt) NPM1 or MLL1-rearrangement (r). While MIs are relatively well-tolerated and induce clinical remissions, these are often short-lived due to development of resistance followed by AML relapse. Through repeated shocks with the MI SNDX-50469, a precursor tool compound to revumenib, followed by recovery, we developed MI-resistant (MITR) AML MV4-11 and OCI-AML3 cells. Present studies show that, compared to MI-sensitive parental cells, MITR cells exhibit an altered epigenome, transcriptome and proteome, without Menin mutations. Through a CRISPR screen, novel druggable MI co-enrichments were identified and targeted, including BRD4, SMARCA4, and CREBBP. Co-treatment with the MI and the SMARCA4/SMARCA2 (BRG1/BRM) inhibitor FHD-286 or the BET proteins inhibitor OTX015 (birabresib), synergistically induced in vitro lethality in MITR and MI-resistant AML cells expressing the mutant Menin (M327I), as well as in patient-derived (PD) AML cells with MLL1-r or mtNPM1 that exhibited ex vivo resistance to MI. Compared to each drug alone, co-treatment with SNDX-5613 (revumenib) and FHD-286 or OTX015 and FHD-286 significantly reduced the in vivo AML burden and improved survival of the immune depleted mice, without inducing significant toxicity, in the xenograft models of MITR and MI-resistant PD MLL1-r AML cells. These findings highlight novel, targeted, drug combinations that overcome MI resistance in AML cells with MLL1-r or mtNPM1.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fiskus et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: