Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The study reveals how negative excise taxes affect financial statements in Russian oil companies, suggesting accounting standards need refinement.
The purpose of the work is to study the methodological features of accounting for negative excise taxes using a damping mechanism, as well as to summarize approaches to disclosing information about them in individual and consolidated financial statements of Russian oil companies. It has been established that the negative excise tax as an element of the damping mechanism is a «budget subsidy» (in the economic sense), a tool to support oil refineries. At the same time, the negative excise tax as a financial support tool is compensatory (aimed at compensating for lost income) and investment (aimed at stimulating investment activity and improving the efficiency of domestic production of petroleum products). Three approaches to accounting for negative excise tax are described, a scheme for its accounting in accounting accounts is presented, and explanations regarding the applicability of Russian accounting standards are given. It is concluded that from the point of view of the principle of priority of economic content over the legal form, negative excise tax should be recognized as income (revenue).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrey A. Aksent'ev (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: