What question did this study set out to answer?

The aim is to provide guidelines for enhancing data and code quality in ecological research.

February 26, 2026Open Access

Recommendation of: The SORTEE Guidelines for Data and Code Quality Control in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. Round#2

Key Points

The aim is to provide guidelines for enhancing data and code quality in ecological research.
Development of guidelines through consensus among experts in ecology and evolutionary biology.
Assessment of existing data and code quality practices.
Recommendations based on best practices and expert opinions.
Highlights the importance of quality control in data and code for ecological studies.
Suggests actionable steps to improve reproducibility and transparency in research.

Abstract

A recommendation of: Joel L. Pick, Bethany Allen, Benedicte Bachelot, Kevin Bairos-Novak, Jack Brand, Barbara Class, Tad Dallas, Pietro D'Amelio, Erola Fenollosa, Esteban Fernández-Juricic, Dylan Gomes, Matthew Grainger, Thomas Guillemaud, Christian John, Ruby Krasnow, Malgorzata Lagisz, Sebastian Lequime, Daniel Maynard, Shinichi Nakagawa, Rose O'Dea, Matthieu Paquet, Quentin Petitjean, Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar, Natalie van Dis, Laura Wilson, Edward R. Ivimey-Cook The SORTEE Guidelines for Data and Code Quality Control in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology https://doi.org/10.32942/X24P8S

Read Full Paperexternally

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ígnasi Bartomeus (Tue,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699f95ba1bc9fecf3dab3ea3 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24072/pci.ecology.100857

Bookmark

View Full Paper