Investigates kelp powder's effects on gel properties in shrimp surimi, enhancing quality and texture.
This study systematically investigated the effects of kelp powder (KP) (0%, 1%, 3%, 6%, 9%) on the gelation behavior, physicochemical properties, and protein structural changes in shrimp ( Litopenaeus vannamei ) surimi gel (SSG). Notably, it enhanced gel strength by 156% and increased hardness from 80.05 N to 231.87 N, while appropriately reducing springiness to form a firmer texture. KP addition also improved water retention by facilitating the conversion of free water into immobilized and bound water, leading to a water holding capacity of 86.6% and a cooking loss as low as 1.6%. Rheological analysis revealed that KP fortification increased the storage modulus (G’) and viscosity, indicating enhanced gel network elasticity. At the molecular level, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy revealed that KP promoted the transition of protein secondary structures from random coils and α-helices to β-sheets. This structural rearrangement was accompanied by strengthened hydrophobic interactions and disulfide bonding, as confirmed by chemical interaction analysis. Scanning electron microscopy further validated that KP facilitated the formation of a denser and more homogeneous gel microstructure. Collectively, KP acts as an effective functional modifier to enhance SSG quality, providing a theoretical basis for the development of high-quality shrimp surimi-based products with natural additives. • Kelp powder (KP) significantly improved the gel strength and textural properties of shrimp surimi gel (SSG). • The structure of SSG became more homogeneous, and the bound water of SSG increased after KP addition. • Disulfide bonds in SSG was enhanced and KP effectively promoted the cross-linking of SSG proteins. • KP notably improved the water-holding capacity (WHC) and viscoelasticity of SSG. • A compact and integral gel matrix was observed in the SSG with KP addition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: