Demonstrates a novel model for predicting urban rail demand under disruptions, indicating improved accuracy in urban rail systems.
With the expansion of cities over time, Urban Rail Transit (URT) networks have also grown significantly. Accurate demand prediction plays a crucial role in supporting planning, scheduling, fleet management, and other operational decisions. This study proposes an Origin-Destination (OD) demand prediction model called Multi-Graph Inductive Representation Learning (mGraphSAGE) for large-scale URT networks under operational uncertainties. The proposed model represents each OD pair as a node in multiple graphs that capture distinct spatial and temporal correlations, thereby enhancing the spatial learning capability of graph-based methods while maintaining scalability. Moreover, operational uncertainties such as train delays and cancellations are explicitly incorporated as model inputs to improve robustness under real-world disruptions. The model is validated on three network scales of the Copenhagen URT system. Experimental results show that mGraphSAGE outperforms both conventional graph-based and machine learning baselines, achieving up to a 5% reduction in RMSE across network scales. The consistent improvement demonstrates the model’s enhanced spatial representation and robustness under operational uncertainties, confirming its suitability for large-scale and disrupted URT environments. • We propose mGraphSAGE, a novel multi-graph inductive representation learning model for OD demand prediction in Urban Rail Transit (URT) networks. • The model represents each OD pair as a node and simultaneously learns from multiple graphs capturing spatial and temporal correlations. • Operational disruptions such as train delays and cancellations are incorporated as input features to improve prediction performance. • The approach is validated on three different scales of the Copenhagen URT network, demonstrating scalability and adaptability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: