A 12-month evaluation shows mostly neurological referrals with low admission rates in urgent care settings, suggesting improvements needed.
• 83% of referrals were neurological, mainly headache disorders • 13% were non-neurological, mostly BPPV and syncope • One-quarter were referrals to explain prior tests • ED referrals increased admission risk Rapid-access neurology (“hot clinic”) pathways provide timely specialist assessment for urgent neurological complaints. Evidence from middle-income settings remains scarce. We conducted a 12-month retrospective evaluation of consecutive referrals to a rapid-access neurology pathway (target: 24–48 hours) at a tertiary center in Buenos Aires, Argentina (June 2022–May 2023). We described referral reasons, final main diagnoses grouped into predefined syndromic categories, non-neurological presentations, and short-term disposition (admission vs. discharge). Multivariable logistic and modified Poisson regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and risk ratios (aRRs) for admission and neurological vs. non-neurological presentations, adjusting for age, sex, referral source, and syndromic category. Among 1,714 visits (mean age 55.2 years; 58.9% women), 69.1% originated from the emergency department (ED). Overall, 83.0% involved a neurological condition, with leading syndromic diagnoses including headache/facial pain (35.4%), peripheral neuropathies (8.5%), and cognitive syndromes (4.5%). Non-neurological presentations accounted for 13.2%, mainly benign paroxysmal positional vertigo and syncope/collapse. One-quarter (25.3%) were referrals to explain prior tests. Admission rate was 7.4%, chiefly for vascular syndromes, headache, and delirium. Adjusted models showed ED referral increased admission risk (aRR 1.47, 95% CI 1.00–2.17) and neurological diagnosis likelihood (aRR 1.63, 95% CI 1.18–2.26), while test-explanation referrals reduced admission risk (aRR 0.21, 95% CI 0.06–0.62). In a middle-income tertiary setting, this rapid-access neurology pathway managed mostly neurological presentations with low admission rates, but substantial activity stemmed from nonselective testing and non-neurological issues. Standardized criteria, training, and imaging stewardship could enhance access for urgent cases and reduce unnecessary utilization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Putalivo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: