Retrospective planning study evaluates VMAT quality and efficiency in cervical cancer, suggesting optimal parameters for treatment.
This retrospective planning study evaluated how arc number (AN) and control-point density (CP) affect VMAT quality, radiobiological endpoints, and workflow efficiency for locally advanced cervical cancer in a resource-conscious setting. Twenty-one patients (FIGO IIB–IIIB) were replanned in Monaco v5.51 (Monte Carlo) for 46 Gy using 6-MV beams (Elekta) with 1–4 coplanar arcs, and dual-arc plans were further analyzed using ≈250, 300, 350, and 400 CP per arc. Target coverage (D98/D95/V95/V98), conformity and homogeneity (CI, HI), and organs-at-risk (OARs) DVH metrics (including D2cc and Vx) were compared alongside monitor units, planning time, and delivery time. Increasing AN improved dose conformity and OAR sparing relative to single-arc plans, whereas increasing CP produced only modest dosimetric changes but substantially increased planning and treatment times. Radiobiological modeling using BED/EQD2 and EUD-based LKB NTCP indicated negligible bladder risk (<0.01%) and low rectal risk (<0.2%), but a higher small-bowel NTCP (~26%) driven by hotspot-sensitive descriptors; Niemierko TCP estimates were similar between leading dual-arc CP settings. Overall, a dual-arc strategy with ~250 CP per arc provided the most practical balance between plan quality, estimated biological effect, and deliverability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Azalmad et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: