Laboratory experiments reveal fracture behavior in tight sandstone under supercritical CO2 shock fracturing, suggesting enhanced network complexity.
To investigate the fracture initiation and propagation behavior of fractures in tight sandstone under the supercritical CO 2 (SCCO 2 ) shock fracturing, laboratory fracturing experiments were conducted using a true-triaxial-like SCCO 2 shock fracturing system. Computed tomography (CT) scanning and three-dimensional fracture reconstruction were employed to elucidate the effects of shock pressure, pore pressure, and in-situ stress on fracture characteristics. In addition, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) transverse relaxation time spectra were used to assess the internal damage induced by SCCO 2 shock fracturing. The results indicate that, compared with conventional hydraulic fracturing and SCCO 2 quasi-static fracturing, SCCO 2 shock fracturing facilitates multidirectional fracture initiation and the formation of complex fracture networks. Increasing shock pressure more readily activates bedding-plane weaknesses, with main and subsidiary fractures interweaving into a dense fracture network. Under the same impulse intensity, elevated pore pressure reduces the effective normal stress and alters stress-wave scattering paths, thereby inducing more branch fractures and enhancing fracture complexity. An increase in differential in-situ stress promotes fracture propagation along the direction of the maximum principal stress, reduces branching, and simplifies fracture morphology. With increasing SCCO 2 shock pressure, pore volume and connectivity generally increase: small-to-medium pores primarily respond through increased number and enhanced connectivity; when the shock pressure rises to 40–45 MPa, crack coalescence generates larger pores and fissures, which play a dominant role in improving flow pathways and effective storage space, ultimately forming a multiscale pore-fracture network.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: