The paper demonstrates the principles of scalar determinism in complex systems, suggesting new insights into randomness and causality.
The prevailing ontological framework of contemporary science posits "randomness" as a fundamental, irreducible property of the physical universe. This paper challenges that assumption, contending that randomness is an epistemic placeholder—a linguistic and mathematical heuristic for unresolved causal complexity. I introduce the Causal Vacuum Postulate, asserting that for an event to be truly stochastic (ontically random), it must occur in a state of absolute suspension from all universal fields—a state physically prohibited by the ubiquity of the Higgs, Gravitational, and Zero-Point fields. By synthesizing evidence from the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), Evolutionary Biology, and Algorithmic Information Theory, I argue for the Principle of Scalar Inheritance: the mechanism by which deterministic subatomic laws scale up to dictate macroscopic outcomes in complex systems. Finally, I argue that ontological randomness raises conceptual difficulties when examined under causal closure—a state that is unavoidable within the manifest universe. Furthermore, I apply this framework to the epistemology of artificial intelligence and macroeconomic market dynamics, illustrating how probabilistic smoothing destroys causal data. Finally, I address the biological paradox of measurement independence, arguing that human cognition itself is deterministically channelled by evolutionary constraints.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shantanu S. Goel (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: