Analysis reveals honey quality issues in Panama, indicating potential fraud and storage problems.
• SPE-UHPLC-DAD method was validated for robust HMF quantification in honey. • 87.5% of artisanal Panamanian honey samples meet international standards. • 13% of commercial samples show HMF > 1000 mg/kg and zero diastase activity. • Extreme HMF levels suggest severe thermal abuse, improper storage or industrial syrup fraud. The global rise in honey demand has been accompanied by increasing concerns over adulteration and synthetic substitutes, complicating quality control for regulators and importers. The quality and freshness of Apis mellifera honey are widely assessed using indicators such as 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) content and diastase activity. HMF increases with excessive heating and storage, while diastase activity declines under the same conditions. This study analyzed 140 honey samples from Panama (2022–2024), including artisanal and commercially available products. HMF quantification was performed using a validated solid-phase extraction (SPE) method coupled with ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection (UHPLC-DAD), following ICH guidelines. Diastase activity was measured with the Phadebas® enzymatic method. Validation confirmed excellent specificity, linearity (r 2 = 0.9995), precision (RSD < 2.5%), accuracy (98–102% recovery), and sensitivity (LOD = 0.15 µg/mL; LOQ = 0.45 µg/mL). Results showed that 50% of commercial honeys did not meet regulatory limits (HMF ≤ 80 mg/kg; diastase ≥ 8 DN), suggesting inadequate storage, thermal abuse or adulteration, while most artisanal honeys samples complied with national and international standards. These findings provide essential evidence for honey quality monitoring in Panama and highlight the importance of enforcing regulations to safeguard consumers and support authentic local products.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hernández et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: