Why the study?
The study was conducted to develop a chronic heart failure module for the Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions tool and evaluate its psychometric properties.
The newly developed ABCC-CHF module is a valid and reliable tool for assessing disease burden in patients with chronic heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May facilitate CHF burden assessment in clinics; leaves open routine adoption pending larger validation studies.
Objective To develop a chronic heart failure (CHF) module for the Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC) tool and evaluate its psychometric properties. Design Mixed methods study. Setting The study was conducted in the Netherlands. Participants Healthcare providers (ie, general practitioners (GPs), practice nurses, cardiologists, heart failure nurse practitioners, heart failure specialist nurses) and patients with CHF were involved in the developmental phase. In the psychometric evaluation, patients with CHF were included. Results The ABCC-CHF module comprised 26 items across CHF-specific domains, accompanied by associated advice. It demonstrated high convergent validity with the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) (97%) and successfully differentiated most known-groups. Internal consistency yielded a Cronbach’s α of 0.92 for the total scale, while test-retest reliability showed an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.97. Conclusion The CHF-specific module is developed and validated. It aims to integrate disease burden into routine healthcare, supporting person-centred care for people with CHF and multimorbidity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Keijsers et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: