Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates how textile design and matrix materials affect the self-sensing ability of carbon fibre composites, indicating implications for structural monitoring.
This study investigates the self-sensing performance of carbon fibre textile-reinforced cementitious composites (TRC) under flexural loading, focusing on the contact resistivity of interfacial junctions in carbon fibre textiles. The combined effects of textile configuration and matrix composition are examined. Two carbon textiles—Type A (5 × 5 mm leno weave with 12 K filaments) and Type B (20 × 20 mm stitch-bonded with 24 K filaments)—were embedded in matrices with and without polypropylene (PP) fibres. Four sensors were strategically placed per specimen to monitor failure modes under four-point bending. Two sensors in shear zones detected potential slippage, while two in constant-moment zones tracked crack propagation. Post-test analysis focused on sensors in the constant-moment zone, with elastic and post-elastic responses quantified via linear and nonlinear regression, respectively. Results show that textile geometry and PP fibre inclusion significantly influence piezoresistive response and textile-matrix interface behaviour. PP fibres reduce gauge factors by 14–38 % and decay rates by 62.9–63.8 %. However, Type B consistently outperforms Type A, exhibiting 6.9–9.7 times higher sensitivity in the elastic stage and 2.5 times slower post-elastic debonding. The stitch-bonded configuration of Type B offers the best performance, balancing superior piezoresistive sensitivity with resistance to textile-matrix interface degradation. These findings support optimised TRC designs for real-time structural health monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elseady et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: