This study examines the enforcement mechanisms for human rights law in domestic courts of Kenya, focusing on how these mechanisms operate and their effectiveness. The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative interviews with court personnel and quantitative data on judicial decisions. Comparative legal analysis is used to assess the consistency of enforcement across different regions of Kenya. Findings indicate that while there are significant challenges in enforcing human rights judgments, there has been an increasing use of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms such as mediation and conciliation. The conclusion is that although progress has been made, consistent improvements are needed to ensure the effective enforcement of human rights in Kenyan courts. Recommendations include enhancing training for judicial officers on human rights law, promoting the use of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, and strengthening oversight bodies to monitor court performance in enforcing judgments.
Omondi et al. (Tue,) studied this question.