This preprint derives an active sensing action update, revealing perception-action dynamics in continuous time.
Description This companion preprint extends Attention Field Theory (AFT) from the perception-only formulation to action in the active sensing sense, i.e. action as control of sampling at the evidence surface. The paper derives the corresponding action update from the same free-energy objective used in AFT, and shows how the standard continuous-time Gaussian (Laplace) Active Inference action update emerges when sensory input depends on action via an action-dependent observation mapping. Main contributions Action extension of the AFT–Active Inference equivalence: a theorem-level derivation of the active sensing action update as descent on free energy under the same analytic regime used for the perception-only equivalence. Coupled perception–action dynamics (continuous time, Gaussian/Laplace regime): presentation of the joint system in which recognition dynamics (posterior mean update) and action co-evolve under free-energy minimisation. Unified geometric framing: retains the AFT geometric machinery (free-energy/salience functional and natural-gradient dynamics) and shows how the Active Inference action term is recovered within that framework under standard assumptions. Scope and assumptions This work focuses on continuous-time dynamics in the Gaussian/Laplace regime and treats action primarily as active sensing (sampling control). Temporally deep planning, policy selection, and motor execution via explicit value or expected-free-energy objectives are discussed as forward directions rather than treated as the central result. Relationship to the original AFT preprint This record is a direct follow-up to the original AFT preprint: Attention Field Theory: Riemannian Geometry of Free-Energy-Driven Attention DynamicsCite all versions (concept DOI, always resolves to the latest AFT version): 10.5281/zenodo.17703956 Keywords Attention Field Theory, Active Inference, Free Energy Principle, active sensing, natural gradient, Laplace approximation, Gaussian variational inference, perception–action coupling, Bayesian brain
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas Orr Anderson (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: