Analysis reveals crystal structure and twinning characteristics of götzenite and wöhlerite in phonolite, indicating unique mineral properties.
Götzenite and wöhlerite were found as part of a fissure assemblage in the Fohberg phonolite (Kaiserstuhl, SW Germany), in close association with natrolite and clinopyroxene (aegirine–augite). Crystal grains were separated and investigated by single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SXRD), electron probe microanalysis (EPMA), and laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS), showing the presence of two intimately intergrown phases, götzenite and wöhlerite. SXRD analyses showed that both minerals are twinned. Götzenite (Na1.50Ca5.18Sr0.13Fe0.032+Mn0.01Zr0.06La0.08Ce0.11Nd0.02Ti0.81Nb0.19(Si2O7)2O1.2F2.8) shows rotation twinning on [001] according to -a-1/2c, −b, c, with contributions of 40 % and 60 % from the two twin domains, respectively. Applying the twin law to the diffraction analysis, the crystal structure was refined to R1 (Fo >4σ (Fo)) = 3.0 %, with a=9.6191(3) Å, b=5.7342(2) Å, c=7.3386(2) Å, α=89.986(1)°, β=101.040(1)°, γ=100.485(1)°, and V=390.40(3) Å3 in space group P1‾. Wöhlerite (Na1.63Ca4.37Sr0.04Zr0.63Fe0.232+Mn0.09Ce0.01Ta0.01Nb0.79Ti0.20(Si2O7)2O2.6F1.4) shows reflection twinning on (100) according to -a-c, b, c, with contributions of 31 % and 69% from the two twin domains, respectively, and with lattice parameters of a=10.842(1) Å, b=10.249(1) Å, c=7.2673(8) Å, β=109.343(4)°, and V=761.9(2) Å3 in the monoclinic space group P21, refined to R1 = 1.3 %. Refractive indices of götzenite were measured using the immersion method yielding nx=1.662(2), ny=1.663(2), nz=1.670(2), and 2V=61(2)°. Optical measurements on the twinned crystal were possible because of the coincidence of the two indicatrices related to each other by rotation about nx being parallel to [001], simulating a unique extinction behavior. Wöhlerite could not be optically examined because of the polysynthetic twinning not showing this effect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fischer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: