Analysis reveals geographic and author representation gaps in pediatric neuro-oncology literature, suggesting equity improvements are needed.
We aimed to explore the representation of authors, the geographic distribution, and research approaches in articles published in global pediatric neuro-oncology since 2015. Seven journals were analyzed. A total of 114 publications were identified, and 84 (73.7%) were published in the last 5 years. Ninety-four were observational studies, while 8 interventional. Most studies (58, 50.9%) were conducted in upper-middle-income countries (UMICs) and were specific to a single country (n = 88, 77.2%). First, senior, and corresponding authors were most frequently from UMICs. Expanding opportunities for training, funding, and support in diverse settings could foster broader contributions and knowledge generation in the field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Licona et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: