Framework integrates AI and control algorithms to reduce operational costs and carbon emissions in energy systems.
To address the challenge of coordinating economic and environmental objectives for Multi-energy Virtual Power Plants (MEVPPs), particularly under ambitious decarbonization policies such as China’s “dual carbon” goals, this paper proposes a novel two-stage scheduling framework that integrates Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) with Model Predictive Control (MPC). The core innovations include the following: (1) high-fidelity physical models capturing wind turbulence correction, photovoltaic temperature-irradiation coupling, and state-of-charge-dependent energy storage efficiency, improving equipment dynamic characterization accuracy by 12.7% compared to conventional models; (2) an enhanced Multi-Agent Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (MADDPG) algorithm incorporating priority experience replay and adaptive noise exploration, which accelerates convergence by 15.6%; (3) a pioneering coordination architecture of “Day-Ahead MADDPG—Real-Time MPC” that manages uncertainties through bidirectional feedback, where real-time deviations refine the long-term policy via experience replay. Simulation results using historical data from a North China industrial park demonstrate that the framework reduces operating costs by 13.3% and carbon emissions by 17.7% compared to particle swarm optimization, outperforms standard DDPG with 3.2% lower operating costs, 5.8% lower carbon emissions, and a 3.3% higher renewable utilization rate (88.6%), and achieves 55% renewable penetration with only 4.1% curtailment. These results validate the framework’s scalability for high-renewable penetration grids and its real-time feasibility, as confirmed by edge computing deployment with latency below 50 ms. This study offers a technically viable and scalable solution for the operation of low-carbon virtual power plants (VPPs), supporting the transition towards sustainable power systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ni et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: