Demonstrates improved diagnostic accuracy for retinal diseases in low-data scenarios, indicating the effectiveness of the iterative teacher-student framework.
Background: Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of irreversible vision loss, particularly in the elderly. Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), a noninvasive imaging modality, is widely used for retinal disease detection. However, the limited availability of labeled OCT datasets poses a significant challenge, making semi-supervised learning a promising approach. This study introduces a novel Iterative Teacher-Student (ITS) framework, which refines pseudo-labeling strategies to improve AMD detection accuracy, particularly in low-data scenarios. Methods: Initially, an optimal supervised model based on EfficientNet was developed to classify AMD using a dataset from Noor Eye Hospital, consisting of 16,822 OCT images. The dataset size was then progressively reduced to 70%, 50%, 20%, and 5% to evaluate model performance under data scarcity. Unlike conventional semi-supervised learning approaches, our ITS framework iteratively refines pseudo-labels, ensuring more reliable knowledge transfer from teacher to student models. Results: The optimized supervised model achieved 87.14% accuracy in AMD classification. As dataset size decreased to 20% and 5%, accuracy declined to 77.05% and 54.78%, respectively. Implementing the ITS framework improved accuracy to 88.56% at 20% and 64.15% at 5%, outperforming traditional semi-supervised methods. Conclusions: This study highlights the potential of semi-supervised learning, particularly our iterative teacher-student approach, to enhance AMD detection when labeled OCT data are scarce. The proposed framework introduces a novel iterative refinement strategy, which can serve as a foundation for future research in retinal disease diagnosis with limited labeled datasets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alizadeh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: