PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 2026Nordic Journal of Urban Studies0 citationsOpen Access

Urban Living Labs as Inter- and Transdisciplinary Arenas for Sustainability Planning Research

View Full Paper
RSRasmus Nedergård SteffansenELEnza LissandrelloNCNuria Corominas CastellNSW Department of Planning and Environment

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore how interdisciplinary collaboration enhances urban sustainability planning processes. The focus is on integrating scientific and lay knowledge.
  • Analysis of a research project focused on participatory environmental co-monitoring.
  • Examination of urban air quality planning in Nordic contexts.
  • Identification of challenges in interdisciplinary research teams.
  • Urban living labs are effective as co-learning environments that integrate diverse knowledge.
  • Addressing epistemological differences can enhance collaboration among researchers.
  • Structural approaches can improve the integration of various knowledge traditions in urban planning.

Abstract

The transition towards sustainable societies necessitates inter- and transdisciplinary knowledge, particularly in urban planning, where diverse knowledge traditions are crucial for decision-making. Despite this, planning practices often remain entrenched in institutional and legal frameworks that hinder the integration of multiple ways of knowing and undervalue lay knowledge. Researcher-led urban innovation processes are increasingly adopting experimental approaches for the multi-stakeholder co-creation of knowledge, addressing urban challenges through interdisciplinary approaches. This article addresses the interdisciplinary collaboration between researchers in experimental urban planning processes by examining a research project that focused on participatory environmental co-monitoring and planning for urban air quality in Nordic contexts. The study builds a bridge between theories of interdisciplinarity, urban experimentation, and planning theory. By presenting urban living labs (ULLs) as arenas for co-learning that integrate scientific and lay knowledge, the article explores how planning researchers can facilitate mutual learning and navigate the micropolitics of knowledge co-production. We develop the concept of cross-disciplinary unknowns to highlight the dynamics and challenges in research teams with diverse epistemological backgrounds. We argue that an explicit and structured approach for explicating epistemological differences can facilitate the detection of unreflected knowledge retention between disciplines.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Steffansen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699fe40c95ddcd3a253e82d2https://doi.org/10.18261/njus.6.2.4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1How urban living lab funding shapes research practices: A critical analysis of 15 European urban accessibility and connectivity projects2026
  2. 2Experimenting in Cities: A Deleuzian Approach to Urban Living Labs for Transformative Adaptation2026
  3. 3Architectural methods as operational drivers: from place-based knowledge to caring change2026
  4. 4Strategic Socio-Technical Innovation in Urban Living Labs: A Framework for Smart City Evolution2025
  5. 5Practicing Situated Action: Urban Living Labs and Volunteer Work2025