Analysis of labor movements reveals urban dynamics influencing worker agency and capitalist regulation.
Debates over “constrained” labor agency open a chance to rethematize “scale” and “urban” in labor geographies. My work helps labor geography grasp how workers’ desire becomes a local locus of capitalist regulation and how this locus can constrain the labor movement into the form of grassroots counter-conducts engaged at the ground level. I analyze scales of labor movements and labor subjectivity in Japanese and US urban histories. These histories have nurtured just-in-time (Japan) and right-to-work (US), post-Taylorist technologies that stimulate workers’ desire to paralyze “labor’s spatial fix” and assist capital’s flexibility/mobility. Using Foucault’s scalar and urban imaginaries centering on the concept of security (power reconstruction through a population’s subjectivity), I explain how regimes as different as just-in-time and right-to-work developed comparable processes of workplace reformation, both “humanizing” capital’s flexibility/mobility into labor’s post-political desire for a workplace “without classes.” The urbanization of capital has developed such security-oriented workplaces to maximize labor’s consent to management. Urban capital circuits in space are assisted by security-oriented workplaces and the rescaled labor regulation these workplaces cultivate. The impetus of urban autonomy is unleashed vis-à-vis territorial power and converts (rescales) the state’s centripetal labor regulation into centrifugal, urbanized forms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahito Hayashi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: